What Not to Build: AI and Machine Learning - Honest Analysis 5168
Uncover why AI startups falter in 2025 - revealing missteps from our analysis of flawed concepts and misguided ambitions.
Most startup ideas in 2025 solve problems that don't exist. We looked at two of them. Here are the two worst offenders and why you shouldn't build them. In the shiny world of AI, not every idea is a winner, and some are little more than high-tech versions of outdated concepts. With AI and machine learning being the buzzwords of the decade, it's easy for founders to get swept away by the promise of algorithms and data, but that doesn't mean every idea is worth pursuing.
Take, for instance, 1回入力するだけで複数のLLMの回答が1つの画面でもらえるサービス. Scoring a 42/100, this concept sits firmly in the 'Roasted' tier for a reason. This is a demo, not a business. It aspires to be the AI equivalent of a multi-search engine from 2004, except this time, it's with large language models. Anyone with a weekend and a React template could ship this. There's no moat, no urgency, and the only audience consists of AI nerds who already have plenty of tabs open and know how to use APIs.
Then there's the floundering 複数のAIツールを比較できるツール, which scores a dismal 28/100. What could be more enticing than the idea of a directory for AI tools? Except that it's already been done and is SEO-spammed beyond recognition. It's a feature, not a startup, and feels more like a Google Sheet with links than a viable business.
| Startup Name | The Flaw | Roast Score | The Pivot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Service for Multiple LLM Responses | This is a demo, not a business. | 42/100 | Target compliance-heavy industries with an audit tool. |
| AI Tools Comparison Tool | A directory is not a business. | 28/100 | Focus on AI-powered advisory services with deep tool integration. |
The 'Nice-to-Have' Trap
Startups stumble into the 'nice-to-have' trap when they mistake features for companies. The Service for Multiple LLM Responses is a case study in this mistake. Congrats, you've built the AI equivalent of a multi-search engine from 2004. It's a slick demo but fails to solve a real problem that users are clamoring to pay for.
Why? Because businesses are wary of sharing their data with a product that offers nothing more than a side-by-side comparison of output from ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. There's no compelling use case that separates this from a tool power users can't make themselves. If users can replicate your service in a few clicks, it's not a service; it's a curiosity.
The Fix Framework
- The Metric to Watch: If user retention < 60% after month one, switch gears.
- The Feature to Cut: Drop the multi-LLM view, it adds clutter, not value.
- The One Thing to Build: Focus on compliance tools with robust reporting.
Why Directories Don't Sell
Oh, the timeless allure of directories! The AI Tools Comparison Tool offers a glimpse into the graveyard of directory startups. Building a 'Capterra for AI tools' might sound appealing, but this idea lacks defensibility, urgency, and most critically, a market willing to hand over cash.
Imagine trying to get vendors to pay for leads when they're already inundated with affiliate marketplaces. It's a bad dream painted as a startup. Monetization? Bleak. Competition? Fierce. And your USP? Invisible. Directories look good on paper, until you realize paper doesn't pay bills.
The Fix Framework
- The Metric to Watch: If page traffic growth is < 5% month-over-month, rethink strategy.
- The Feature to Cut: Remove the overwhelming filters and focus on intuitive design.
- The One Thing to Build: An AI advisor for personalized tool recommendations.
Patterns of Missteps
What leads these AI dreams astray? First, the overestimation of 'neat' features as market solutions. Second, the underestimation of competition and overconfidence in execution without meaningful differentiation. Lastly, a gullibility toward 'if you build it, they will come', no, they won't.
Entrepreneurs, if your business model hinges on cavalier assumptions, be prepared for a rude awakening. Real needs solve real problems; curiosities get left in the dust.
Actionable Red Flags
- Feature vs. Product: Just because it's a great feature doesn't make it a viable business.
- Market Validation: Do people need it, or just want it? The gap is your startup grave.
- User Retention: If you're not solving a pain point, users will vanish, fast.
- Competitive Edge: What's stopping someone else from doing it better?
- Consumption Metrics: Traffic is vanity; converting it is sanity.
Conclusion
2025 doesn't need another directory or multi-LLM viewer. It needs solutions that tackle genuine issues, not features masquerading as startups. If your AI idea isn't saving time, money, or sanity, consider saving yourself the trouble.
Written by Walid Boulanouar.
Connect with them on LinkedIn: Check LinkedIn Profile
Want Your Startup Idea Roasted Next?
Reading about brutal honesty is one thing. Experiencing it is another.